RecruitingNCT06273176

The RECMAP-study: Resection With or Without Intraoperative Mapping for Recurrent Glioblastoma

The RECMAP-study: Resection With or Without Intraoperative Mapping for Recurrent Glioblastoma: Study Protocol for An International Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study (ENCRAM 2301)


Sponsor

Erasmus Medical Center

Enrollment

225 participants

Start Date

Jan 1, 2023

Study Type

OBSERVATIONAL

Conditions

Summary

Resection of glioblastoma in or near functional brain tissue is challenging because of the proximity of important structures to the tumor site. To pursue maximal resection in a safe manner, mapping methods have been developed to test for motor and language function during the operation. Previous evidence suggests that these techniques are beneficial for maximum safe resection in newly diagnosed grade 2-4 astrocytoma, grade 2-3 oligodendroglioma, and recently, glioblastoma. However, their effects in recurrent glioblastoma are still poorly understood. The aim of this study, therefore, is to compare the effects of awake mapping and asleep mapping with no mapping in resections for recurrent glioblastoma. This study is an international, multicenter, prospective 3-arm cohort study of observational nature. Recurrent glioblastoma patients will be operated with mapping or no mapping techniques with a 1:1 ratio. Primary endpoints are: 1) proportion of patients with NIHSS (National Institute of Health Stroke Scale) deterioration at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery and 2) residual tumor volume of the contrast-enhancing and non-contrast-enhancing part as assessed by a neuroradiologist on postoperative contrast MRI scans. Secondary endpoints are: 1) overall survival (OS), 2) progression-free survival (PFS), 4) health-related quality of life (HRQoL) at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery, and 4) frequency and severity of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) in each arm. Estimated total duration of the study is 5 years. Patient inclusion is 4 years, follow-up is 1 year. The study will be carried out by the centers affiliated with the European and North American Consortium and Registry for Intraoperative Mapping (ENCRAM).


Eligibility

Max Age: 90 Years

Plain Language Summary

Simplified for easier understanding

This study is comparing two surgical approaches for removing recurrent glioblastoma (a brain cancer that has returned): standard surgery versus surgery guided by intraoperative brain mapping, which helps surgeons avoid damaging critical brain areas responsible for movement, speech, and vision. **You may be eligible if...** - You are between 18 and 90 years old - Your glioblastoma has returned and meets imaging criteria for recurrence - The tumor is located near important brain areas (motor, sensory, speech, or vision areas) - Your neurosurgeon has determined the tumor is safely removable **You may NOT be eligible if...** - Your tumor is in the brainstem, cerebellum, or midline - You have multiple tumor spots - You have a pacemaker or other metal implants that prevent MRI scanning Talk to your doctor to see if this trial is right for you.

This summary was AI-generated to explain the trial in plain language. It is not medical advice. Always discuss eligibility with your doctor before enrolling in a clinical trial.

Interested in this trial?

Get notified about updates and connect with the research team.

Interventions

PROCEDUREAwake mapping under local anesthesia

During an awake craniotomy, the patient is awake and cooperative during the resection of the tumor while the surgeon uses electro(sub)cortical mapping to prevent damage to eloquent areas.

PROCEDUREAsleep mapping under general anesthesia

During asleep mapping under general anesthesia, the surgeon uses electro(sub)cortical mapping with evoked potentials (MEPs, SSEPs or continuous dynamic mapping) to prevent damage to eloquent areas.

PROCEDUREResection under general anesthesia without mapping

During resection under general anesthesia without mapping, the surgeon does not use any intraoperative stimulation mapping techniques to identify eloquent areas.


Locations(8)

University of California, San Francisco

San Francisco, California, United States

Massachusetts General Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

University Hospital Leuven

Leuven, Belgium

Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg

Heidelberg, Germany

Technical University Munich

Munich, Germany

Erasmus Medical Center

Rotterdam, South Holland, Netherlands

Haaglanden Medical Center

The Hague, Netherlands

Inselspital Universitätsspital Bern

Bern, Switzerland

View Full Details on ClinicalTrials.gov

For the most up-to-date information, visit the official listing.

Visit

NCT06273176


Related Trials