Comparing Efficacy Between Restricted Kinematic Alignment vs Mechanical Alignment in Bilateral TKA
Comparison of Functional Outcomes in Restricted Kinematic Alignment and Mechanical Alignment in Robotic Assisted Simultaneous Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty. A Randomized Controlled Trial
Thammasat University Hospital
50 participants
Mar 14, 2024
INTERVENTIONAL
Conditions
Summary
The goal of this RCT is to investigate efficacy between restricted kinematic alignment and mechanical alignment TKA in simultaneous bilateral TKA patients. The main question\[s\] it aims to answer are: * Does rKA have better functional outcomes than MA in simultaneous bilateral TKA patients? * Does rKA have lower pain score than MA in simultaneous bilateral TKA patients? Participants will undergo simultaneous bilateral TKA and randomized one side will use rKA and the other side will use MA.
Eligibility
Inclusion Criteria3
- Age 40-80 years
- Diagnosis bilateral primary osteoarthritis of knee joint and undergo simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty
- ASA classification I-II
Exclusion Criteria4
- Valgus deformity
- BMI > 40kg/m2
- History of previous knee surgery
- Active infection of the knee joint
Interested in this trial?
Get notified about updates and connect with the research team.
Interventions
TKA using restricted kinematic alignment under robotic assisted surgery (MAKO).
TKA using mechanical alignment under robotic assisted surgery (MAKO).
Locations(1)
View Full Details on ClinicalTrials.gov
For the most up-to-date information, visit the official listing.
NCT06323577