RecruitingNot ApplicableNCT06858358

Robotic Medial Congruent Vs. Conventional Medial Pivot TKA

Comparison of Robotic-Assisted Medial Congruent and Conventional Medial Pivot Total Knee Arthroplasty: a Prospective, Multicenter Analysis


Sponsor

George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Sciences and Technology of Targu Mures

Enrollment

300 participants

Start Date

Feb 24, 2025

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Conditions

Summary

This multicenter, prospective cohort study will evaluate whether Robotic-Assisted total knee arthroplasty (RATKA) with a Medial Congruent implant is a successful method to improve implant alignment, insert thickness accuracy, and patient satisfaction, compared to a conventional TKA (cTKA) Medial Pivot technique. It aims to assess and compare clinical and functional outcomes in patients with severe knee osteoarthritis at 3, 6, and 12 months.


Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria1

  • Patients with severe osteoarthritis (greater than III Ahlback)

Exclusion Criteria1

  • Patients who refuse participation in the study Low-grade osteoarthritis

Interested in this trial?

Get notified about updates and connect with the research team.

Interventions

PROCEDURERobotic assisted total knee arthroplasty

• ROSA RATKA with Zimmer Biomet Persona Medial Congruent

PROCEDUREConventional total knee arthroplasty (cTKA)

cTKA with Microport Evolution Medial-Pivot


Locations(2)

MedLife Humanitas Hospital

Cluj-Napoca, Cluj, Romania

Medicover Cluj Hospital

Cluj-Napoca, Cluj, Romania

View Full Details on ClinicalTrials.gov

For the most up-to-date information, visit the official listing.

Visit

NCT06858358


Related Trials