No Endotamponade for Macular Hole Repair: the NEMAR Study
The No Endotamponade for Macular Hole Repair (NEMAR) Study: An International Multi-center Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Macular Hole Closure Using Internal Limiting Membrane Flap Without Endotamponade Versus Conventional Surgery
Chinese University of Hong Kong
180 participants
Sep 16, 2025
INTERVENTIONAL
Conditions
Summary
Full-thickness macular hole (MH) is a common sight threatening macular condition with a prevalence of 3.3 per 1000 individuals. Prompt surgical repair of MH is imperative in preventing irreversible vision loss from MH as the majority of patients would experience progressive loss of central vision, often resulting in visual acuity (VA) of 20/200 or worse and the spontaneous closure rate is less than 10%. Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling (with or without ILM flap) and gas tamponade, herein referred to as conventional surgery, is the current standard-of-care surgical technique in repairing MH. Recently, a novel surgical technique that omits the need of gas tamponade to repair MH has been proposed, early results from retrospective studies were encouraging. The purpose of this prospective international multi-centre randomised controlled study is to compare the efficacy and safety of two surgical techniques in treating MH: 1. Conventional surgery: PPV with ILM peeling and gas or silicone oil tamponade 2. ILM flap with no gas tamponade surgery: PPV with ILM flap with no gas tamponade
Eligibility
Inclusion Criteria4
- Age >= 18 years
- Presence of full thickness macular hole in one eye (defined as full thickness discontinuity of neuro-sensory retina at the macula on optical coherence tomography)
- Able to comply to post-operative posture
- VA ≥0.05 and ≤0.8
Exclusion Criteria9
- Fellow eye enrolled in the study
- Eyes that underwent previous macular surgery
- Presence of maculopathy other than macular hole, epi-retinal membrane or myopic maculopathy. For example, age-related macular degeneration, diabetic macular edema or pre-existing macular scar
- Axial length >/= 28mm or presence of significant myopic chorio-retinal atrophy involving the fovea
- Minimum linear diameter >/=800µm
- Presence of contraindications to intraocular gas, such as advanced glaucoma or uncontrolled glaucoma
- Significant macular puckering (Govetto staging ≥ stage 2)
- Patients who are unable to give informed consent
- Patients who are pregnant
Interested in this trial?
Get notified about updates and connect with the research team.
Interventions
Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with temporal internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap would be performed. Perfluorocarbon liquid (PFCL) or viscoelastic may be used as an adjunct. Air/Fluid exchange would be performed at the end of surgery, further exchange of air with 8-14% octafluoropropane (C3F8) would be performed based on operating surgeon's discretion. In cases a temporal ILM flap could not be created, an ILM flap would be created from other quadrants, for example, a nasal ILM would be created instead. Patients with visually significant cataract may undergo concomitant phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation or deferred to post-operative month 6-12. Patients would be instructed to adopt a face-down posturing in the first 5 days following operation.
Pars plana vitrectomy with temporal internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap would be performed. The ILM flap would be stabilised over the macular hole using perfluorocarbon liquid (PFCL) followed by sub-PFCL dispersive viscoelastic injection. The PFCL would be removed towards the end of surgery. In cases a temporal ILM flap could not be created, an ILM flap would be created from other quadrants, for example, a nasal ILM would be created instead. Concomitant phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation would be performed in patients with visually significant cataract or deferred to post-operative month 6-12. Patients will be instructed to avoid excessive movement and adopt a face forward/ supine position for first 24 hours. Afterwards, there would be no restriction on post-operative posturing.
Locations(3)
View Full Details on ClinicalTrials.gov
For the most up-to-date information, visit the official listing.
NCT06908824