Prospective Randomized Observer Blinded Single Center Study Comparing 90-day Functional Outcome in Patients Who Received Intravenous Propofol Infusion Versus Inhalational Sevoflurane for General Anesthesia During Mechanical Thrombectomy in Patients Who Suffered From Acute Ischemic Stroke
University of Kansas Medical Center
120 participants
Jun 4, 2025
INTERVENTIONAL
Conditions
Summary
This study is being done to compare outcomes after surgery for individuals who receive anesthesia through by inhaling medication and individuals who receive anesthesia intravenously by needle when experiencing treatment for their stroke. Currently very little is known about the outcomes for patients when comparing these two techniques of providing anesthesia during surgery. This study will provide information regarding outcomes that will help health care providers decide which technique will be better for patients
Eligibility
Inclusion Criteria1
- \>18 years Acute ischemic stroke requiring endovascular treatment.
Exclusion Criteria7
- \<18 years
- Pregnant patients
- Patients with malignant hyperthermia
- Allergies or any contraindications to either inhalational or intravenous agents
- Patients already on intravenous anesthetic infusions
- Prisoners
- Students and employees
Interested in this trial?
Get notified about updates and connect with the research team.
Interventions
During treatment for acute ischemic stroke, patients will be given either inhalation or intravenous anesthesia.
Locations(1)
View Full Details on ClinicalTrials.gov
For the most up-to-date information, visit the official listing.
NCT07001267