RecruitingNCT07043491

Comparison of Endoscopy and Esophagram for the Routine Evaluation of Anastomosis After McKeown Esophagectomy


Sponsor

Sun Yat-sen University

Enrollment

2 participants

Start Date

Nov 4, 2024

Study Type

OBSERVATIONAL

Conditions

Summary

This retrospective cohort study reviewed patients who underwent McKeown esophagectomy. All patients routinely underwent either endoscopy or esophagram for the evaluation of anastomosis on postoperative day 7. The initiation of oral intake depended on the status of anastomosis according to the assessment result of endoscopy or esophagram. All patients were followed up for six months after the assessment of anastomosis.


Eligibility

Min Age: 18 Years

Exclusion Criteria1

  • We excluded the patient with histologically confirmed benign tumors of the esophagus or esophagogastric junction and the patient who had incomplete data.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTEndoscopy

We first observed the residual esophagus to evaluate the mucosal color. We then reached the top of the anastomosis to obtain a full view of the anastomosis to exclude obvious leakage around that site. We next conducted a more detailed endoscopic examination at a close focal distance, circumferentially around the anastomosis. During this process, we utilized saline solution to meticulously remove white fibrin coverings and bloodstains to the greatest extent possible to ensure a thorough evaluation of anastomotic integrity. Finally, we inspected the staple line of the tubularized stomach to exclude gastric fistula and assessed the perfusion of the gastric graft. Endoscopic findings were assessed by an additional endoscopist and 3 esophageal surgeons during the examination, as well as by reviewing captured images or videos after endoscopy.


Locations(1)

Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center

Guangzhou, Guangdong, China

View Full Details on ClinicalTrials.gov

For the most up-to-date information, visit the official listing.

Visit

NCT07043491


Related Trials