Comparison of V-NOTES and Laparoscopic Mesh-Free Sacrocolpopexy Techniques
Comparison of V-NOTES (Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery) Mesh-Free Sacrocolpopexy and Laparoscopic Mesh-Free Sacrocolpopexy
Havva Betül Bacak
52 participants
Jul 1, 2025
INTERVENTIONAL
Conditions
Summary
This study aims to compare the surgical outcomes, safety profiles, and patient satisfaction between two minimally invasive techniques for pelvic organ prolapse repair: Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (V-NOTES) mesh-free sacrocolpopexy and laparoscopic mesh-free sacrocolpopexy. By evaluating perioperative data, complication rates, anatomical and functional outcomes, this trial seeks to determine whether the V-NOTES approach provides comparable or superior results to the traditional laparoscopic technique, without the use of synthetic mesh.
Eligibility
Inclusion Criteria1
- Patients who applied to Gaziosmanpaşa Education and Research Hospital, Gynecology and Obstetrics Clinic, who underwent surgery due to symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse with apical and anterior POP Q stage 2 and above, Being over 18 years old Patients who underwent surgery by experienced surgeons
Exclusion Criteria1
- Having previously received KT and/or RT due to any malignancy Having previously undergone surgery due to proplasus Patients with severe cardiovascular or respiratory disease
Interested in this trial?
Get notified about updates and connect with the research team.
Interventions
Mesh-free sacrocolpopexy performed via vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (V-NOTES).
Mesh-free sacrocolpopexy performed via conventional laparoscopy.
Locations(1)
View Full Details on ClinicalTrials.gov
For the most up-to-date information, visit the official listing.
NCT07082023