RecruitingNot ApplicableNCT07292597

Circadian Timing and Time Perception in Healthy Adults

How Do Individual Differences in Circadian Rhythms Influence Time Perception?


Sponsor

University of Aarhus

Enrollment

128 participants

Start Date

Oct 25, 2025

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Conditions

Summary

This study examines how a person's natural daily rhythm ("chronotype") affects the way time is experienced and judged. Healthy Danish-speaking adults (23-45 years) who are clearly morning-type or evening-type will complete two lab sessions in a crossover design: one at their preferred time of day (e.g., morning for morning-types) and one at the opposite time (misaligned). In each session, participants do brief computerized tasks that measure time estimation/production, vigilance (psychomotor vigilance task), decision-making, and responses to social information, plus simple color-vision tasks. Short questionnaires about sleepiness, mood, fatigue, and the subjective "passage of time" are collected before, during, and after testing. A subset will wear a wrist actigraphy device for one week beforehand to characterize sleep-wake patterns. Testing is conducted under standardized lab conditions with scheduled breaks. The main goal is to determine whether time judgments and vigilance are less accurate during the misaligned session and whether decision-making and social responses also vary with circadian timing. Risks are minimal and mainly relate to temporary tiredness when tested at a non-preferred time; participants may stop at any time. Participation is voluntary. Data are pseudonymized and handled under GDPR. Participants receive DKK 300 after completing both sessions (pro-rated if they withdraw early). Results will be published regardless of outcome, and de-identified data/code will be shared after publication.This study examines how a person's natural daily rhythm ("chronotype") affects the way time is experienced and judged. Healthy Danish-speaking adults (23-45 years) who are clearly morning-type or evening-type will complete two lab sessions in a crossover design: one at their preferred time of day (e.g., morning for morning-types) and one at the opposite time (misaligned). In each session, participants do brief computerized tasks that measure time estimation/production, vigilance (psychomotor vigilance task), decision-making, and responses to social information, plus simple color-vision tasks. Short questionnaires about sleepiness, mood, fatigue, and the subjective "passage of time" are collected before, during, and after testing. A subset will wear a wrist actigraphy device for one week beforehand to characterize sleep-wake patterns. Testing is conducted under standardized lab conditions with scheduled breaks. The main goal is to determine whether time judgments and vigilance are less accurate during the misaligned session and whether decision-making and social responses also vary with circadian timing. Risks are minimal and mainly relate to temporary tiredness when tested at a non-preferred time; participants may stop at any time. Participation is voluntary. Data are pseudonymized and handled under GDPR. Participants receive DKK 300 after completing both sessions (pro-rated if they withdraw early). Results will be published regardless of outcome, and de-identified data/code will be shared after publication.


Eligibility

Min Age: 23 YearsMax Age: 45 Years

Inclusion Criteria9

  • Aged 23 to 45 years
  • Able to understand and communicate in Danish
  • Completed at least upper secondary education (e.g., gymnasium)
  • Categorized as either a Morning Type (MT) or Evening Type (ET) based on standardized chronotype assessments:
  • Munich Chronotype Questionnaire (MCTQ):
  • MT: sleep midpoint on free days (MSFsc) ≤ 03:00
  • ET: sleep midpoint on free days (MSFsc) ≥ 05:00
  • Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ):
  • One of four defined chronotype categories (definitely morning, moderately morning, moderately evening, definitely evening).

Exclusion Criteria5

  • Current engagement in shift work, rotating schedules, or other forms of irregular sleep-wake timing
  • Diagnosis of any neurological, psychiatric, or sleep-related disorder (e.g., insomnia, narcolepsy, sleep apnea)
  • Use of medications that affect sleep, alertness, or circadian functioning (e.g., melatonin, stimulants, antidepressants)
  • International travel across time zones within the four weeks preceding study participation
  • Are classified as having an intermediate chronotype based on validated chronotype assessments (MCTQ or MEQ), as this group does not provide the necessary contrast to evaluate circadian alignment effects.

Interested in this trial?

Get notified about updates and connect with the research team.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALSession timing relative to chronotype

Two-period, two-sequence crossover manipulation of testing time. Each participant completes both sessions: (1) circadian-congruent timing (morning types tested in the morning; evening types in the evening) and (2) circadian-incongruent timing (opposite time). Session order is randomized (AB/BA). Sessions are run morning and evening on the same day with a substantial interval; no visible clocks; 12-h pre-session caffeine/strenuous-exercise restriction; standardized lab light/temperature. Primary outcomes: time-estimation/production bias and PVT lapses/RT.


Locations(1)

Cognition and Behavior Lab

Aarhus, Denmark

View Full Details on ClinicalTrials.gov

For the most up-to-date information, visit the official listing.

Visit

NCT07292597


Related Trials