Intraosseous vs Infiltration Anesthesia in Molar-Incisor Hypomineralization (MIH) Children
A Comparative Evaluation of the Clinical Effectiveness of Computer-Assisted Intraosseous and Infiltration Anesthesia Techniques in Children With Molar-Incisor Hypomineralization
Ankara Yildirim Beyazıt University
30 participants
Nov 7, 2025
INTERVENTIONAL
Conditions
Summary
This study aims to compare the effectiveness of intraosseous and infiltration anesthesia techniques administered using a computer-assisted anesthesia device (SleeperOne® 5; Dental HiTec, France) during restorative treatments of permanent first molars affected by Molar-Incisor Hypomineralization (MIH) in children. Clinical effectiveness will be evaluated based on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), behavioral pain response, pulse rate , salivary chromogranin A levels, and the need for additional anesthesia.
Eligibility
Plain Language Summary
Simplified for easier understanding
This summary was AI-generated to explain the trial in plain language. It is not medical advice. Always discuss eligibility with your doctor before enrolling in a clinical trial.
Interested in this trial?
Get notified about updates and connect with the research team.
Interventions
Articaine hydrochloride: 40 mg/mL Epinephrine (adrenaline): 0.012 mg/mL, corresponding to a 1:100,000 dilution.
Articaine hydrochloride: 40 mg/mL Epinephrine (adrenaline): 0.012 mg/mL, corresponding to a 1:100,000 dilution.
Locations(1)
View Full Details on ClinicalTrials.gov
For the most up-to-date information, visit the official listing.
NCT07352813