Occlusal Equilibration vs. Sham Therapies for TMDs: Post-Trial Follow-up (OEST)
OEST Protocol: Physiologically Oriented Occlusal Equilibration Versus Sham Therapy for Chronic Temporomandibular Disorders (TMDs): 10 Years Post-trial Follow-up
Urbano Santana Penin
110 participants
Feb 16, 2026
OBSERVATIONAL
Conditions
Summary
Chronic temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) affect the masticatory muscles, the temporomandibular joints (TMJs), and associated structures. Except in cases of trauma, their etiology remains uncertain, debated, and multifactorial. Conservative therapies-including no active intervention-often alleviate symptoms; however, approximately 3% of the population develops persistent forms associated with substantial individual suffering and significant social and economic burden. At the Unit of Occlusion and Prosthodontics of the University of Santiago de Compostela (USC), Physiologically Oriented Occlusal Equilibration (POOE) has been used for chronic painful TMDs since 1985. POOE aims to correct unilateral mastication patterns and to establish appropriate non-working side contacts in order to protect the temporomandibular joints from mechanical overload. Singh (Cochrane, 2024) emphasized that occlusal interventions should be evaluated with long-term follow-up of at least 3-5 years. This is a single-blind study: the evaluator remains blinded to treatment allocation during outcome assessment. The aim of this observational study is to assess the long-term effectiveness of POOE treatments for chronic TMDs from 1985 to the present. Treatment effectiveness will be confirmed if the reduction in pain achieved with POOE is statistically significant and clinically meaningful (≥1.5/10 on a 0-10 visual analog scale) compared with sham therapy at ≥3 years post-intervention relative to baseline. Additionally, effectiveness will be supported if the proportion of individuals meeting criteria for chronic TMD ("affected") is lower in the POOE-treated group than in those receiving alternative therapies.
Eligibility
Inclusion Criteria7
- Previous occlusal equilibration for TMD pain at the University of Santiago.
- Be diagnosed with joint and/or muscle TMD pain according to DC/TMD.
- Be aged 18-85 years.
- Be completely dentate with normal or adequately restored occlusion (fixed crowns/bridges allowed).
- Report pretreatment significant TMD pain (VAS/NRS 4-9 on a 0-10 scale).
- Have actively sought treatment and been referred to the University/Hospital service.
- Have undergone ≥6 months of prior conservative therapy.
Exclusion Criteria8
- Psychosis, major depression, substance abuse, or cognitive impairment.
- Opioid (morphine-derivative) addiction.
- Ongoing litigation or disability claims related to chronic pain.
- Dental professional background.
- Orthodontic treatment within the last 2 years.
- Severe tooth mobility (grade 3).
- Other pain conditions indistinguishable from or more severe than TMD pain.
- Additionally, patients will be excluded if minimally invasive occlusal adjustment cannot achieve equilibration, defined by: 2 mm discrepancy between maximal intercuspation and centric occlusion, and/or 4 mm total interarch discrepancy (≥2 mm on one side) in defined premolar/molars reference points, measured intraorally using a Boley gauge.
Interested in this trial?
Get notified about updates and connect with the research team.
Locations(2)
View Full Details on ClinicalTrials.gov
For the most up-to-date information, visit the official listing.
NCT07445516