Comparison of the Efficacy of Conventional Versus Minimally Invasive Non-Surgical Periodontal Therapy in Periodontitis Patients
Comparison of the Efficacy of Conventional Versus Minimally Invasive Non-Surgical Periodontal Therapy in Periodontitis Patients (Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial)
Mansoura University
30 participants
Aug 5, 2025
INTERVENTIONAL
Conditions
Summary
the aim of this study is to investigate the clinical outcomes of Minimally Invasive Non-Surgical Therapy(MINST) compared to Conventional non-surgical periodontal therapy (CNST)
Eligibility
Plain Language Summary
Simplified for easier understanding
This summary was AI-generated to explain the trial in plain language. It is not medical advice. Always discuss eligibility with your doctor before enrolling in a clinical trial.
Interested in this trial?
Get notified about updates and connect with the research team.
Interventions
On the conventional non-surgical periodontal therapy side, a power-driven piezo•electric ultrasonic scaling device with scaling tips will be used the majority of the time to debride subgingival biofilm and calculus. and manual standard gracey curette instruments will be used to refine residuals from root surfaces.
Briefly. the root surface of teeth will be thoroughly debrided by a minimally invasive approach using specific thin and delicate piezo-electric scaling tips (Woodpecker � Tip P3. Am Perfect sp. z o .• � Poland) and manual miniature periodontal curettes {� Dent Solutions. Cairo. Egypt) for reducing periodontal tissue trauma. Adjunctive use of magnification loupes will be performed.
Locations(1)
View Full Details on ClinicalTrials.gov
For the most up-to-date information, visit the official listing.
NCT07671274