The Cesarean Study: Optimizing Cesarean Sections and Improving Patient-Healthcare Provider Trust Using Evidence Informed Recommendations
The Cesarean Study
Lund University
260 participants
May 5, 2026
INTERVENTIONAL
Conditions
Summary
Cesarean section (CS) rates have rapidly increased worldwide, with projections suggesting that by 2030, one in every three births will be by CS (1). In Sweden, rates have more than doubled from 9% in the 1990s, to 20% in 2024 (2). While CS can be a life-saving procedure when medically indicated, non-essential CS increase the risk of complications and have been linked to increased maternal morbidity and even death, neonatal respiratory issues, and longer recovery times (3). They also place added strain on already burdened healthcare systems by increasing the use of medical resources and staff capacity. The purpose of this project is to evaluate the use of the "Cesarean Bundle", a three-part intervention designed to improve patient-clinician communication and trust. Primary Aim: To evaluate the impact of the "Cesarean Bundle" in improving patient-clinician communication and trust compared to standard care. Hypothesis: Use of the "Cesarean Bundle" will improve patients' trust in their healthcare providers. Secondary Aim: To evaluate whether adoption of the "Cesarean Bundle" is associated with changes in cesarean section rates, especially among low-risk obstetric populations. Hypothesis: Implementation of the "Cesarean Bundle" will be associated with a reduction in overall cesarean section rates, particularly among low-risk pregnancies.
Eligibility
Plain Language Summary
Simplified for easier understanding
This summary was AI-generated to explain the trial in plain language. It is not medical advice. Always discuss eligibility with your doctor before enrolling in a clinical trial.
Interested in this trial?
Get notified about updates and connect with the research team.
Interventions
The Cesarean Bundle is a structured, three-component clinical intervention designed to support evidence-based and shared decision-making for planned cesarean sections: 1. Cesarean Discussion Guide: A standardized decision-support tool used during all consultations for planned cesarean section. It incorporates clinical data, risk stratification (e.g., Robson classification), and clear information on short- and long-term risks and benefits of cesarean versus vaginal birth, while also capturing patient preferences and values. 2. Mandatory Second/team Opinion: All requests for planned cesarean section require review and approval by a second clinician/team before a final decision is made. 3. Regularl Multidisciplinary Team Meetings: Regular team-based reviews of cases and decision-making patterns to promote consistency, reflection, and adherence to evidence-based practice. The intervention is integrated into routine care, with minimal disruption to standard workflows, and is support
Locations(1)
View Full Details on ClinicalTrials.gov
For the most up-to-date information, visit the official listing.
NCT07759622