Helmet NIV vs. CPAP vs. High-flow Nasal Oxygen in Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure
Helmet Noninvasive Ventilation vs. Continuous Positive Airway Pressure vs. High-flow Nasal Oxygen as First-line Treatment of Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure (HENIVOT2). An Open-label, Multicentre Randomized Trial
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS
1,200 participants
Mar 1, 2022
INTERVENTIONAL
Conditions
Summary
Multicenter, open label, three-arm randomized trial to assess the effect of helmet noninvasive ventilation vs. helmet continuous positive airway pressure vs. high-flow nasal oxygen on the rate of endotracheal intubation of patients with acute moderate-to-severe hypoxemic respiratory failure
Eligibility
Plain Language Summary
Simplified for easier understanding
This summary was AI-generated to explain the trial in plain language. It is not medical advice. Always discuss eligibility with your doctor before enrolling in a clinical trial.
Interested in this trial?
Get notified about updates and connect with the research team.
Interventions
Treatment of acute hypoxemic respiratory failure
Locations(1)
View Full Details on ClinicalTrials.gov
For the most up-to-date information, visit the official listing.
NCT05089695