Comparison of Drainage Methods in Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy (DEMURE)
Comparison of the Application Effects of Different Drainage Modes in the Perioperative Period of Minimally Invasive Three-Field Radical Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer
Ruijin Hospital
75 participants
Apr 30, 2025
INTERVENTIONAL
Conditions
Summary
This RCT compares three drainage approaches after minimally invasive esophagectomy (chest tube + thoracic mediastinal drainage tube, thoracic, and abdominal mediastinal drainage tube) to evaluate perioperative outcomes, addressing current evidence gaps in pain and complication profiles.
Eligibility
Plain Language Summary
Simplified for easier understanding
This summary was AI-generated to explain the trial in plain language. It is not medical advice. Always discuss eligibility with your doctor before enrolling in a clinical trial.
Interested in this trial?
Get notified about updates and connect with the research team.
Interventions
Transthoracic mediastinal drainage was performed for postoperative management of the patient.
Transperitoneal mediastinal drainage was performed for postoperative management of the patient.
Chest tube insertion combined with transthoracic mediastinal drainage was performed for postoperative management of the patient.
Locations(1)
View Full Details on ClinicalTrials.gov
For the most up-to-date information, visit the official listing.
NCT07004634