Rhomboid Intercostal and Subserratus Plane Block vs Erector Spinae Plane Block in Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery
Comparison of the Efficacy of Rhomboid Intercostal and Subserratus Plane Block (RISS) Versus Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) Blocks in Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS) for Postoperative Pain Management and Respiratory Function
Bursa City Hospital
90 participants
Nov 15, 2024
INTERVENTIONAL
Conditions
Summary
To compare the rhomboid intercostal subserratus plane block with the erector spinae plane block regarding their analgesic efficacy and effects on respiratory function for patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.
Eligibility
Inclusion Criteria5
- Patients who will undergo VATS
- Who agrees to participate
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I, II, and III
- Elective surgery
- Age between 18 and 80 years
Exclusion Criteria7
- Local anesthetic allergy
- Who disagrees to participate
- ASA physical status IV and V
- Emergency surgery
- Hemorrhagic disease
- Thoracic vertebrae deformity
- Thoracic vertebrae surgery
Interested in this trial?
Get notified about updates and connect with the research team.
Interventions
ESP blocks are performed for patients undergoing VATS.
RISS blocks are performed for patients undergoing VATS.
Locations(1)
View Full Details on ClinicalTrials.gov
For the most up-to-date information, visit the official listing.
NCT07011069