IVM - Fresh ET (THE SAIGON PROTOCOL) Versus IVF - FET in PCOS Women
The Effectiveness and Safety of In Vitro Maturation With Fresh Embryo Transfer (The SAIGON Protocol) Versus In Vitro Fertilization With Frozen Embryo Transfer in Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
Mỹ Đức Hospital
600 participants
Sep 22, 2025
INTERVENTIONAL
Conditions
Summary
Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART) aim to increase success rates while minimizing patient risks. For women with high AFC or PCOS, conventional IVF carries a high risk of OHSS (Ho et al., 2019). A modern IVF strategy to prevent this uses a GnRH agonist trigger, requiring a "freeze-all" and subsequent FET (Wong et al., 2017). This reduces OHSS risk but can increase time to pregnancy (Vuong et al., 2021) and treatment burden. IVM is a patient-friendly alternative that eliminates OHSS risk by avoiding high-dose gonadotropins. A 2020 trial by Vuong et al. compared CAPA-IVM-FET to conventional IVF-FET in women with high AFC. IVM yielded a comparable live birth rate (35.2%) versus IVF (43.2%), with a 0% OHSS rate in IVM compared to 0.7% in IVF (Vuong et al., 2020). The optimal transfer method (fresh or frozen) in IVM cycles is debated. A 2021 pilot RCT by Vuong et al. found a freeze-only strategy after CAPA-IVM led to a significantly higher live birth rate (60%) than a fresh transfer (20%) (Vuong et al., 2021), but increased time to pregnancy (194 vs. 150 days) (Vuong et al., 2021). A refined CAPA-IVM protocol, which uses no gonadotropins, allowed for fresh embryo transfer in the same cycle, resulting in a numerically higher ongoing pregnancy rate (43.3% vs. 33.3%) than FET (Vuong et al., 2025). This raises an important question: how does a simplified IVM strategy with fresh transfer compare to the established "safety-net" IVF strategy with FET? These two approaches represent opposing clinical philosophies. No large-scale study has yet compared them in women with PCOS. Therefore, this study is designed to compare the SAIGON protocol (gonadotropin-free CAPA-IVM with fresh ET) against a standard GnRH-antagonist IVF protocol with agonist trigger and subsequent FET.
Eligibility
Plain Language Summary
Simplified for easier understanding
This summary was AI-generated to explain the trial in plain language. It is not medical advice. Always discuss eligibility with your doctor before enrolling in a clinical trial.
Interested in this trial?
Get notified about updates and connect with the research team.
Interventions
Patients randomized to this arm will receive estradiol valerate 8 mg/day. IVM will be performed after ≥10 days of estrogen and ET ≥8 mm. From the day of ICSI, they will continue estradiol and start vaginal progesterone 800 mg/day + dydrogesterone (20mg/day). A fresh embryo transfer will subsequently be performed.
Patients randomized into this group will receive FSH at a dose of 150 IU/day. Oocyte retrieval will be performed once the criteria for triggering are fulfilled, followed by embryo cryopreservation and frozen embryo transfer in the subsequent cycle. Endometrial preparation for frozen embryo transfer will be conducted using an exogenous steroids regimen. Patients will receive estradiol 8 mg/day starting from cycle days 2-3 for 10 days. When the endometrial thickness reaches ≥8 mm, luteal phase support will be initiated with vaginal progesterone 800 mg/day plus dydrogesterone 20 mg/day.
Locations(1)
View Full Details on ClinicalTrials.gov
For the most up-to-date information, visit the official listing.
NCT07171970