Clinical Outcomes of Drug-Coated Balloons in the Treatment of Patients With Coronary De Novo Chronic Total Occlusion Lesions
Clinical Outcomes of Drug-Coated Balloons in the Treatment of Patients With Coronary De Novo Chronic Total Occlusion Lesions: A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial
The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University
200 participants
Apr 28, 2025
INTERVENTIONAL
Conditions
Summary
The aim of this study is to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of drug-coated balloon (DCB) strategies, including DCB alone or hybrid strategies of DCB and drug-eluting stent (DES), compared to DES-only in patients with chronic total occlusion (CTO) after successful recanalization. Through a prospective, multicenter randomized controlled trial, we will directly compare the long-term outcomes of these two treatment strategies in CTO patients to fill the gap in existing research regarding direct comparative data between DCB and DES in CTO treatment. This study expects to provide high-quality evidence for optimizing CTO treatment, potentially improving treatment strategies in complex cases, reducing stent usage, lowering the risk of complications, and ultimately enhancing patient prognosis.
Eligibility
Inclusion Criteria10
- Patient voluntarily participates in the study and has provided written informed consent.
- Presence of clinical indication for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) of the Chronic Total Occlusion (CTO) (e.g., symptoms of angina pectoris or evidence of myocardial ischemia).
- Target lesion is located in a de novo coronary artery.
- Angiographically confirmed CTO (TIMI grade 0 flow), with evidence supporting an occlusion duration of ≥ 3 months.
- Successful guidewire crossing of the target CTO lesion has been achieved during the index procedure.
- After adequate vessel preparation: Distal TIMI grade 3 flow has been restored; Target lesion residual diameter stenosis is \< 50% (e.g., by visual estimate or QCA as per protocol); Absence of flow-limiting dissection or other complications requiring immediate stent implantation.
- Target vessel Reference Vessel Diameter (RVD) is between 2.25 mm and 4.0 mm (inclusive, assessed by visual estimate or QCA/IVUS as per protocol).
- In the judgment of the interventional operator, the lesion is deemed suitable for treatment with both a Drug-Coated Balloon (DCB)-based strategy and a Drug-Eluting Stent (DES)-only strategy.
- Patient is able and willing to comply with the study protocol requirements, including the specified follow-up schedule.
- Female patients of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test prior to enrollment and agree to use an effective method of contraception throughout the study period.
Exclusion Criteria15
- Target CTO lesion is the culprit vessel responsible for the presenting Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI).
- Patient is in cardiogenic shock.
- Presence of severe heart failure (New York Heart Association \[NYHA\] Class IV) or Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) \< 30%.
- History of stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA) within the previous 3 months.
- Known high risk of bleeding or contraindication to Dual Antiplatelet Therapy (DAPT).
- Presence of severe hepatic impairment and/or severe renal impairment (e.g., estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate \[eGFR\] \< 30 ml/min/1.73m² or requirement for chronic dialysis).
- Known hypersensitivity or contraindication to required study medications (e.g., antiplatelet agents, contrast media), DCB/DES drug coatings, or device materials (e.g., stent alloys, polymers).
- Target lesion located in an unprotected left main coronary artery, a saphenous vein graft, or an arterial graft.
- Presence of severe lesion calcification that prevents adequate vessel expansion despite attempted lesion preparation techniques (e.g., rotational atherectomy, intravascular lithotripsy).
- Target lesion is a CTO within a previously stented segment (In-Stent Restenosis \[ISR\] or In-Stent Thrombosis \[IST\]).
- Failed attempt at CTO recanalization during the index procedure (i.e., failure to cross the lesion with a guidewire or failure to restore TIMI grade 3 flow).
- Occurrence of a complication after vessel preparation that necessitates immediate stent implantation (e.g., flow-limiting dissection, perforation requiring a covered stent).
- Concurrent enrollment in another interventional clinical trial that may interfere with the study endpoints or assessments.
- Female patient is pregnant or breastfeeding.
- Patient judged by the investigator to be unsuitable for the study for any reason, including anticipated poor compliance with the protocol.
Interested in this trial?
Get notified about updates and connect with the research team.
Interventions
Drug-eluting stents meeting study criteria (e.g., sirolimus-, paclitaxel-, or everolimus-eluting stents; specific models selected by operators according to clinical practice) were chosen. Stent diameter was determined by the target vessel reference diameter (2.25-4.0 mm), with length covering the occluded segment plus 5 mm of healthy vessel proximal and distal to the lesion. Stents were deployed at 8-16 atm to ensure optimal apposition. Intraoperative angiography confirmed no residual stenosis (\<10%) and TIMI grade 3 flow. When multiple stents were required, an overlapping technique was utilized to ensure complete lesion coverage.
Drug-coated balloons meeting study criteria (e.g., paclitaxel- or sirolimus-coated DCB; specific models selected by operators according to clinical practice) were chosen. DCB diameter was determined by the target vessel reference diameter (2.25-4.0 mm), with length covering the occluded segment plus 5 mm proximal and distal to the lesion. DCB inflation was maintained for ≥60 seconds at 8-12 atm to ensure adequate drug delivery to the vessel wall. Intraoperative angiography confirmed \<50% residual stenosis, TIMI grade 3 flow, and absence of serious complications. DES implantation was permitted (recorded as hybrid strategy) if any of the following conditions occurred after DCB application: Residual stenosis ≥50% with hemodynamic significance; Non-flow-limiting dissection requiring stent support based on operator judgment; Other technical difficulties resulting in DCB-alone treatment failure. DES selection was consistent with the DES-only group.
Locations(18)
View Full Details on ClinicalTrials.gov
For the most up-to-date information, visit the official listing.
NCT07463664