Comparison of Stress Response Evoked by Conventional Versus Videolaryngoscope
Comparison of the Efficacy of Non-channelled Video Laryngoscopy Versus Direct Laryngoscopy in Terms of Stress Response and Intubation Time: a Single-blinded Randomized Controlled Trial
Sindh Institute of Urology and Transplantation
124 participants
Mar 5, 2026
INTERVENTIONAL
Conditions
Summary
Impact of using video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy technique in terms of improved hemodynamics post intubation and time taken for intubation.
Eligibility
Inclusion Criteria8
- ASA I \& II
- Age 18-60 years.
- Preoperatively nonhypertensive and hemodynamically stable patients
- Patients scheduled for elective procedures not involving airway surgeries
- Patients with informed consent
- Mallampati score I and II
- Interincisor gap \> 3 cms
- BMI less than 30 kg/m²
Exclusion Criteria8
- Patient refusal
- ASA III, IV \& V
- Hemodynamically unstable patients
- Patients with Hypertension and Ischemic Heart Disease (whether controlled or uncontrolled)
- Airway abnormalities, including congenital airway malformations \& maxillofacial abnormalities
- Head, neck or any facial traumas or history of prior head, neck or airway surgeries
- Emergency procedures
- Pregnancy
Interested in this trial?
Get notified about updates and connect with the research team.
Interventions
In this group, endotracheal intubation will be done through a video laryngoscope
In this group, endotracheal intubation will be done through a direct laryngoscope
Locations(1)
View Full Details on ClinicalTrials.gov
For the most up-to-date information, visit the official listing.
NCT07510542