Passive Fit of Implant-Supported Frameworks: Digital vs Conventional Impressions
Passive Fit Evaluation of Full-Arch Implant-supported Frameworks Using Digital and Conventional Impression Techniques: Crossover Study
Mansoura University
8 participants
Jan 25, 2026
INTERVENTIONAL
Conditions
Summary
This randomized crossover clinical trial compares the passivity of fit of complete-arch mandibular implant-supported frameworks fabricated using three impression techniques: a non-calibrated splinted digital scan body system (IO-Connect), a Reverse Scan Body (RSB) digital impression technique, and a conventional splinted open-tray impression technique. Eight completely edentulous patients each receiving four mandibular implants will be included. Passivity of fit will be evaluated clinically using the Sheffield one-screw test and radiographically using intraoral periapical radiographs obtained with the parallel technique.
Eligibility
Plain Language Summary
Simplified for easier understanding
This summary was AI-generated to explain the trial in plain language. It is not medical advice. Always discuss eligibility with your doctor before enrolling in a clinical trial.
Interested in this trial?
Get notified about updates and connect with the research team.
Interventions
Digital impression of the mandibular arch obtained using IO-Connect non-calibrated splinted scan bodies to fabricate the implant-supported framework for Group I.
Digital impression obtained using the Reverse Scan Body (RSB) technique, involving extraoral scanning of scan bodies and superimposition with intraoral tissue scans, to fabricate the implant-supported framework for Group II.
Conventional splinted open-tray impression using polyvinyl siloxane material and Type IV dental stone to fabricate the implant-supported framework for Group III.
Locations(1)
View Full Details on ClinicalTrials.gov
For the most up-to-date information, visit the official listing.
NCT07778199