RecruitingNot ApplicableNCT06320899

Mid- or High-flex Rods Versus Low-flex Rods of SpineShape System IV for Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Spine Diseases

Mid- or High-flex Rods Versus Low-flex Rods of SpineShape System IV for Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Spine Diseases - a Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Non-inferiority Study


Sponsor

SpineSave AG

Enrollment

126 participants

Start Date

Jun 4, 2024

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Conditions

Summary

The purpose of this multi-center, randomized, clinical study is to show that the treatment of degenerative lumbar spine with high- or mid-flex rods is not inferior to the treatment with low-flex rods in terms of clinical and safety-related results. The primary aim is to compare the reduction in back pain after the treatment with high- or mid-flex rods with that after treatment with low-flex rods. Secondary, the functionality after treatment with high- or mid-flex rods will be compared to that after treatment with low-flex rods.


Eligibility

Min Age: 18 YearsMax Age: 99 Years

Inclusion Criteria12

  • degenerative symptoms in 1 to 2 segments in the lumbar spine L1-S1
  • signed informed consent of participant
  • confirmation of the participant that the attendance of follow-up visits are intended
  • Body-Mass-Index \< 32
  • Pedicle screw axis distance \< 30mm
  • one or more of the following indications:
  • (dynamic) stenosis in the spinal canal
  • neuroforaminal stenosis
  • facet joint syndrome / spondylarthrosis
  • discopathy (recurrent disc hernia)
  • degenerative spondylolisthesis (Meyerding \<1)
  • instability (hypermobility with antelishtesis, hypomobility with retrolisthesis if decompressed)

Exclusion Criteria20

  • missing bone structure, e.g. due to congenital anomalies or sever anatomical deformities that make anchoring of the implant impossible
  • damaged structural tissue, e.g. due to a bone fracture
  • application to the thoracic or cervical spine
  • pronounced idiopathic scoliosis
  • spondylolisthesis \> Meyerding grad 1
  • isthmic spondolylysis
  • bone tumor
  • osteochondrosis modic type I, II or III
  • osteoporosis, which could impair screw anchoring
  • history with third party implants
  • patients with an active local or systemic infection
  • known allergy to titatnium alloys
  • skeleton in growth (epiphyseal joints not closed)
  • severe muscular neuronal or vascular disease
  • immunosuppresive therapy
  • long-term therapy with cortisone
  • heavy smokers (regular consumption of more than six cigarettes per day), drug addicts and alcoholics
  • chronic pain patients
  • incapable of judgment or emergency situation
  • implantation during pregnancy

Interested in this trial?

Get notified about updates and connect with the research team.

Interventions

DEVICESpineShape System IV straight rod elastic

Implantation of SpineShape System IV straight rod elastic

DEVICESpineShape System IV straight rod medium

Implantation of SpineShape System IV straight rod medium (mid-flex)

DEVICESpineShape System IV straight rod stiff

Implantation of SpineShape System IV straight rod stiff (low-flex)


Locations(2)

Spital Aarberg

Aarberg, Switzerland

Hirslanden Klinik Linde

Biel, Switzerland

View Full Details on ClinicalTrials.gov

For the most up-to-date information, visit the official listing.

Visit

NCT06320899


Related Trials