Comparing T-stenting And Minimal Protrusion With External Minicrush for Treatment of Complex Coronary Bifurcation
Comparing T-stenting And Minimal Protrusion With External Minicrush for Treatment of Complex Coronary Bifurcation: Insights From TREX Registry
San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital
382 participants
Jun 1, 2024
OBSERVATIONAL
Conditions
Summary
Nowadays, no studies compare the T-stenting And Minimal Protrusion (TAP) and External Minicrush techniques in treating complex coronary bifurcation, so eventually, procedural, clinical and safety differences remain unknown.
Eligibility
Inclusion Criteria3
- Patients >18 years of age
- Patients with an indication for PCI, including chronic coronary syndrome and acute coronary syndromes (STEMI, NSTEMI, unstable angina)
- Patients with at least one true coronary bifurcation according to the Medina classification 1.1.1, 0.1.1, 1.0.1, 0.0.1
Exclusion Criteria6
- Patients who do not want or cannot sign the informed consent for the procedure.
- Patients with severe peripheral vascular disease that limits vascular access to the point of making the procedure unsafe.
- Patients with a life expectancy of <1 year.
- Patients with planned major surgery require prolonged discontinuation of antiplatelet therapy.
- Pregnant women.
- Patients who cannot take antiplatelet therapy for any reason.
Interested in this trial?
Get notified about updates and connect with the research team.
Interventions
Percutaneous coronary intervention is a procedure that require coronary stenosis dilatation with dilatation catheter balloon and generally stent implantation. The study involve coronary stenosis at bifurcation level that require complex coronary techniques such as External Minicrush or TAP technique.
Locations(1)
View Full Details on ClinicalTrials.gov
For the most up-to-date information, visit the official listing.
NCT06484647